|
BCI Community Assessment Report |
|
COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT REPORT For (Jhapa, Morang & Sunsari Districts) Jan-Apr, 2000 Submitted to: Family Health International Nepal Gairidhara, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: AMDA/FHI, AIDS Prevention Project Damak, Jhapa, Nepal ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: First
of all we would like to express our heartily thank to USAID/Nepal and FHI Nepal
for their support, guidance and effective direction for the project. We would
like to express our gratitude and special thanks to Ms. Barbara
Franklin-Communication Officer, FHI Asia Regional Office Bangkok for her
valuable suggestion and comment during her visit in our Project Office and field
sites. We are also grateful with Ms. Asha Basnyat, Program Manager and Mr.
Bharat Bilas Panta, Program Officer FHI-Nepal for their periodic visit and
feedback during our community assessment. Ms.
Franklin, Ms. Basnyat and Mr. Pant have visited and observed our outreach
activities in actual field sites and provided feedback and suggestions during
the initial phase of our outreach activities. They have also highlighted the
present rules and policies of USAID and FHI. Those information, comment and
suggestions have been very useful and significant for us to implement the BCI
program in the community. We
are grateful to the AMDA/FHI project management committee for their initial
consideration and continuous support through out the community assessment. We
would like to thank to all those INGOs, NGOs, GOs and private sectors for their
cooperation and valuable suggestion during the period of Community Assessment.
We wish to express our gratitude to those entire key-informants including FSWs
and their clients for their patience, keen interest and kind cooperation while
providing the needed information for the Assessment. We
wish to express our thanks to Life Saving And Life Giving Society for their
technical support to provide related training to all program staffs. Finally,
we would like to thanks all writers, publishers, journalists for their HIV/AIDS/STIs
related materials, which we have reviewed during Community Assessment. Project Manager
Community
Assessment Team: 1)
Dr. Anil Kumar Das
Project Coordinator 2)
Dr. Shankar Psd. Huzdar
Project Manager
3)
Ms Jaga Maya Shrestha
Program Officer
4)
Mr. Yuba Raj Chaudhary
Finance/Admin Officer
5)
Mr. Bishweshwar Psd. Mishra
Finance Assistant
6)
Mr. Ajij Psd. Poudyal
Program Assistant
7)
Mr. Bishow R. Neupane
Field Supervisor 8)
Mr. Bhagawat Psd. Paudel
Field Supervisor
9)
Mr. Venas Shrestha
Outreach Educator 10)
Mr. Sailesh Rana Magar
Outreach Educator
11)
Mr. Saday Kumar Das
Outreach Educator 12)
Ms. Khem K. Timsina
Outreach Educator 13)
Ms. Laxmi Lata Paudel
Outreach Educator 14)
Mr. Dhundi Raj Bhandari
Outreach Educator 15)
Mr. Lal Bdr. Chaudhary
Outreach Educator
16)
Mr. Ananda K. Shrestha
Outreach Educator 17)
Mr. Niran Sangroula
Outreach Educator
18)
Mr. Mahesh Acharya
Outreach Educator 19)
Ms. Bishnu Maya Sapkota
Outreach Educator 20)
Ms. Ranjana Pokhrel
Outreach Educator 21)
Ms. Lakhi Gurung
Community Counselor
22) Ms. Lata Khadka Community Counselor
List of
Acronyms: AHAPP
AMDA Hospital AIDS Prevention Project AIDS
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AMDA
Association of Medical Doctors of Asia BCI
Behavior Change Intervention CSM
Condom Social Marketing CRS
Nepal Contraceptive Retail Sales Company (Pvt.) Ltd. DACC
District AIDS Coordination Committee DHO
District Health Office FHI
Family Health International FPAN
Family Planing Association of Nepal FSW
Female Sex Worker GOs
Governmental Organizations NGOs
Non-Governmental Organizations HIV
Human Immune deficiency Virus IDU
Injection Drug User IEC
Information, education and Communication STD
Sexually Transmitted Disease STI
Sexually Transmitted Infections USAID
United States Agency for International Development ABSTRACTS: The
Community Assessment was conducted from 23 January to 22 April 2000 in three
districts Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari. The main objective of the Community
Assessment is to estimate the magnitude of commercial sex work, i.e. to identify
the locations and types of commercial sex work, estimate the number of FSWs and
their clients and identify their occupational categories and demographic
characteristics. For the
Community Assessment we've followed the following steps: 1) Contact with
organizations and literature review 2) Structured
Observation 3) Key
Informants interview 4) Report
writing We
have identified 30 most risky places for high-risk sexual activities and
contacted 16 FSWs during community assessment. Community
Assessment is the first step of program, and during the period we've conducted
introduction and coordination visit with various organizations/agencies and
private sectors in the project areas. We've tried to study and observe the all
aspects of community including high-risk sexual behavior. We've studied
different literatures related with HIV/AIDS/STDs, conducted structured
observation, selected Key Informants and interviewed them. The Community
Assessment was carried out through personal contact, group discussion and using
questionnaire for interview. From
the study we've found that there are a large number of people involved in risky
sexual behavior in the project areas. Community people don't have detail
knowledge about HIV/AIDS/STDs. Many of them are STD clients but they are not
getting proper treatment. There is easy accessibility of condom but they are not
using condom that much because the majorities don't know that the condom is an
effective means of protection from HIV/AIDS/STDs. During
the Community Assessment the community people showed positive response towards
our program. They are very interested and enthusiastic. We are hopeful that if
we can implement our program effectively, the community people will definitely
help us to work towards our project goal. If we work together we will succeed. TABLE OF
CONTENTS:
Contents
Page No. CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Back ground
1
1.2 Justification of the community Assessment
2
1.3 Map of Project Districts
3
1.4 Objective of the Community Assessment
4
CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY & FINDINGS
2.1 Map of High - Risk Places of Project Area
5
2.2 Assessment Techniques/Approach
6
2.3 Steps of Community assessment
6
2.3.1 Contact with organizations/Literature Review
7
2.3.1.1 Review of Related Literature Document/Literature 8
2.3.2
Structured Observation
9
2.3.3 Key Informants Interview
9
2.3.3.1 Identification of Risk behavior of FSWs & their Clients
10
2.3.3.2 Location & Nature of Risk Behavior
11
2.3.3.3 Trend & Nature of Risk Behavior
2.3.3.3.1 FSW
16
2.3.3.3.2 Clients
17
2.3.3.3.3 Cross Border
17
2.3.3.3.4 Intravenous Drug Users
18 2.4 Geographical Structure
18 2.5 Political & Demographic Structure of Project Area
19 2.6 Educational Institution
19 2.7 Health Care Facilities
19 CHAPTER 3
3.1 Positive Aspect of Community Assessment
20
3.2 Lesson Learned From Community Assessment
20
3.3 Conclusion 21 ANNEXES: I. Name List of
Different Organizations Contacted in the Project Area. II. Name List
of Key Informants. III. Population
of Different V.D.Cs and Municipalities of Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari. IV. Educational
Institutes in Different V.D.Cs and Municipalities of Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari. V. List of
Health Institutes Distributing Condom Free. VI. Some Photos
of Community Assessment. VII. Reviewed
Literature regarding HIV/AIDS/STIs. VIII. Estimated
Number of Primary Target Groups in our Project Area. |